Google's Ads Decoded team says people are asking longer questions in AI Mode, the chat-style search experience, and using Search earlier in their decisions. For your budget, that means someone may click your ad while still comparing options, and your landing page has to answer the questions they bring with them.
What changed
The October 28 episode of Ads Decoded featured Ginny Marvin, Google Ads Product Liaison, and Shivani Mohan, Search Vice President of Data Science and User Experience Research. Marvin's takeaways for advertisers planning 2027 cover three points: discovery is moving earlier in the funnel, queries are getting longer, and people still want human perspectives such as podcasts, video reviews, and firsthand experience. Search Engine Journal covers the episode and the posts that followed it.
The headline number is that AI Mode queries are three times longer than traditional searches. That figure comes from a U.S. AI Mode report published in May 2026, which Google's October 28 advertising announcement cites. It's an average query length. It doesn't show that these searches convert better, and Google hasn't published conversion benchmarks for this behavior.
The other figure, that one in six searches is multimodal (meaning they mix text, voice, or images), is narrower than it sounds. The underlying report covers AI Mode searches in the U.S., not every Google search, and Marvin's post doesn't say how it was measured.
What it means for you
Anyone sending paid clicks to a service page, product page, or quote form should pay attention. If a customer needs three answers before they call and your page answers none of them, you're paying for a visit that leaves to find those answers somewhere else.
You can mostly ignore this if your landing page already covers price ranges, service areas, what happens after someone gets in touch, and the main limitations of what you offer. Those pages are doing the job this discussion describes.
The cost of doing nothing isn't a sudden drop. It's slow leakage: visitors who bounce back to Google to compare competitors, and no clear way to see it unless you look.
What to do
- Collect the real questions. Pull them from phone calls, emails, quote requests, chat logs, and the search terms report in Google Ads. Look for full sentences and the concern behind them: cost, timing, compatibility, or whether the job is worth doing.
- Check which questions your pages answer. Read each landing page as a stranger who has never heard of you. Look for price, compatibility, setup or process, and limitations. If the honest answer is "we'd have to see it first," say that on the page and give a clear next step.
- Move the common answers up. If the useful information sits in a long FAQ at the bottom, bring the most common concern up near the call-to-action.
- Add proof where questions come up. Short demos, customer stories, or reviews that show how a job went can answer a specific concern. Pick ones that address a known question, not generic praise. Google's comments point to firsthand experience mattering to buyers, but neither source shows that adding more videos brings more traffic. Test one page before rolling it out.
- Judge results over the full buying timeline. Check whether visitors to comparison or educational pages later become customers, using call logs or your CRM. Impressions and click-through rate alone won't tell you that, and Google hasn't said how these behaviors will move those numbers.
There's no deadline and no setting to switch on. This is a content review, and it's worth doing before you change any bids.
If you'd like a second pair of eyes on your landing pages, I can run a free scan of your account and point out the questions your pages seem to skip.
Scan my site